An interesting Article on Letting Agents
I came across a very interesting article here:
http://www.propertywire.com/news/europe/lettings-agent-industry-200905243127.html
Obviously reporting the bad news is of more interest than reporting the good news. Whether other agents or not charge unfairly locally, I cant comment on, it is rare we hear from new tenants who have rented from our competitors that they were ripped off or overcharged. I have seen paperwork from other agents locally who charge tenants for things we have never charged for and probably would never charge for. I have heard of agents charging landlords for various supplementary items too. Ultimately it is up to the customer (landlord/tenant) to make an informed decision on whether they are happy with the charges. No-one forces anyone's hand here. It is very rare that we quote an admin fee to a tenant to be met by whistling through teeth that it is in some way too expensive.
Do we charge the Landlord and Tenant for renewing an agreement? No! Do we charge tenants inventory, check-in, check-out fees ? No! Do we charge anything but reasonable admin fees and nothing further? Yes!
This artice also states the following:
"It says that such charges are usually for carrying out tasks that are no more than the routine business of letting and managing a property. It found that 73% of tenants were unhappy with the service that they got from their letting agent"
I can give numerous examples where tenants have asked us to do work which is not part of our "routine business" or our daily role but we find ourselves doing it because ultimately it keeps the customer happy. There may be a perception in lettings that the payment of rent is a legal obligation therefore effectively you have your tenant "tied" to you. This is not so, especially in a small town where people talk and dont forget a tenant can also decide to leave a property if they are not happy with the service they are getting. One letting agent once said to me "if they want the flat badly enough they will pay our charges". Well, possibly but its not really the attitude towards a customer I believe.
One example of where a letting agent is asked to do things they are not responsible for is with tenant utility bills. In this business and despite our best efforts most utility companies are a nightmare to deal with when it comes to transfer of utility accounts. We have a number of foreign tenants who come into our shop with a utility bill problem expecting us to phone npower, british gas etc on their behalf because they do not understand what is going on or they simply dont know. They forget that it our telephone bill on the 0870/0845 number, its our time in being kept on hold for ages, ultimately doing something we are not getting paid for. This is not me moaning about it or complaining about our tenants. This is me merely trying to put it into persepective from the letting agent point of view.
We get calls saying "I have no credit, can you call me back please", "someone is parked in my space what you gonna do about it?" "next door has left litter (not even our tenants)" just minor things perhaps but nonetheless take up a significant amount of unpaid time.
We recently assisted a Management Company in employing a private parking contractor to control unauthorised parking in a block of 20 flats we manage in Gloucester. We have made it clear that we are not responsible for anyone getting ticketed and are nothing to do with the parking control company yet are receiving repeated phone calls from tenants who have received tickets and are not happy about it, expect the letting agent to sort it out and even posting parking tickets to us to appeal against on behalf of the tenat! Again even if you politely say this is not our responsibility you are still spending unpaid time on it!
To report our industry as "out of control" is slightly sensationalist I feel. The media and Watchdog have on occassion reported on rogue agents and of course they exist, but I still believe most of us are here to do our job well, we love what we do, we do not take tenants or landlords for granted and certainly not "a licence to print money" as that report would suggest!
